![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Have you noticed . . . .
You're experiencing the effects of SPRAWL!
The Saturday Evening Post c 2001
Sprawl is ...
The recent essays regarding the Westgate plaza project
(Democrat and Chronicle July 13, 2000) and it's relation to "smart
growth" ideas have caused me to reflect about the public's perception of
this planning tool. As member of the citizen-based Smart Growth Coalition, I
hope to add some clarity to this discussion. "Smart growth" ideas grew out of a response to
uncontrolled, rampant sprawl. And examples of sprawl are clearly evident in
Monroe County even though there is no population growth. Consider some recent
examples. While the town of Webster is forging ahead to promote new development,
its green space is vanishing. Studies have shown that a new typical tract house
requires about ($1.29) in services for every dollar in taxes paid. The
cost of new infrastructure that follows new development is often not taken into
account and taxes must eventually rise to support it. Other examples include the
proposed Thruway exit for Chili, a project of dubious necessity that will likely
bring sprawl to a largely agricultural area at the cost to taxpayers, the
environment and local village life. In a further example, our local industrial
development agency, COMIDA, frequently encourages businesses to develop new
commercial buildings when vacant commercial space abounds in Monroe County. "Smart growth" is a group of ideas centered on
the principal that new municipal infrastructure ought to follow some rational,
thought-out plan embraced by and benefiting the community. Some of these ideas
include the re-use of existing infrastructure, open space preservation,
walk-able "villages", development corridors and master planning. In
it's most core manifestation, "smart growth" asks municipal planners
to choose carefully when and where new roads, sewers, and water lines are to be
laid to best benefit the community. "Smart growth" planning does not
tell you where you can and can't build a house. Instead
it changes the
incentives for development. For example, where growth is discouraged,
investments in municipal infrastructure can be limited. "Smart growth" is often the victim of semantics
and may appear controversial because opponents are often misinformed about its
meaning. Many believe "smart growth" means "big government"
making all of the decisions about where you can live. However, we live in a
democracy, it is our representatives, especially those at the local level, who
would implement and be agents for "smart growth" legislation and
initiatives. And since we elect those representatives, it is our decision
whether or not we would like to direct development, or have it direct us. To illustrate what I believe defines "smart
growth", I offer some local examples. In Supervisor Ralph Esposito's
Westgate project, there are elements of "smart growth" in that an
aging strip mall has been re-used rather than simply abandoned, open space has
been increased and the public's voice has helped craft the arrangement. In
Brighton, a building moratorium has been implemented to study how the town's
remaining green Like other progressive ideas that are at first misunderstood, I believe our locally elected leaders will eventually embrace "smart growth". Once it is understood that these ideas are forwarded to improve the quality of life for area residents and reduce tax burdens, I believe that people will wonder why there was ever any opposition. We at the Smart Growth Coalition applaud efforts like Supervisor Esposito's and hope others will follow. Roger Janezic |