Home
What Can I do?
Myth & Facts
Mission
Links
Joining
Our Community
Have you noticed
Impacts on sprawl


Smart Growth Coalition

Have you noticed . . . .

 
You spend more time in your car than you used to . . .
Another expensive school bond issue . . .
The woods in which your family used to walk are gone . . .
The old neighborhood store isn't there anymore . . .
Local farms are disappearing one by one . . .
Another large vacant store sits next to a new commercial building . . .
It's hard to find services in the city . . .

You're experiencing the effects of SPRAWL!

The Saturday Evening Post c 2001

Sprawl is ...
Uncoordinated, leapfrogging development of undeveloped land which is draining our cities and town centers of their vitality.
Clogging our roads with traffic,
Lowering property values and hiking taxes
Diminishing our quality of life, and
Changing the character of our neighborhoods
Like many areas across our country, our region is experiencing the ill effects of sprawl!

The recent essays regarding the Westgate plaza project (Democrat and Chronicle July 13, 2000) and it's relation to "smart growth" ideas have caused me to reflect about the public's perception of this planning tool. As member of the citizen-based Smart Growth Coalition, I hope to add some clarity to this discussion.

"Smart growth" ideas grew out of a response to uncontrolled, rampant sprawl. And examples of sprawl are clearly evident in Monroe County even though there is no population growth. Consider some recent examples. While the town of Webster is forging ahead to promote new development, its green space is vanishing. Studies have shown that a new typical tract house requires about ($1.29) in services for every dollar in taxes paid. The cost of new infrastructure that follows new development is often not taken into account and taxes must eventually rise to support it. Other examples include the proposed Thruway exit for Chili, a project of dubious necessity that will likely bring sprawl to a largely agricultural area at the cost to taxpayers, the environment and local village life. In a further example, our local industrial development agency, COMIDA, frequently encourages businesses to develop new commercial buildings when vacant commercial space abounds in Monroe County.

"Smart growth" is a group of ideas centered on the principal that new municipal infrastructure ought to follow some rational, thought-out plan embraced by and benefiting the community. Some of these ideas include the re-use of existing infrastructure, open space preservation, walk-able "villages", development corridors and master planning. In it's most core manifestation, "smart growth" asks municipal planners to choose carefully when and where new roads, sewers, and water lines are to be laid to best benefit the community. "Smart growth" planning does not tell you where you can and can't build a house. Instead it changes the incentives for development. For example, where growth is discouraged, investments in municipal infrastructure can be limited.  

"Smart growth" is often the victim of semantics and may appear controversial because opponents are often misinformed about its meaning. Many believe "smart growth" means "big government" making all of the decisions about where you can live. However, we live in a democracy, it is our representatives, especially those at the local level, who would implement and be agents for "smart growth" legislation and initiatives. And since we elect those representatives, it is our decision whether or not we would like to direct development, or have it direct us.

To illustrate what I believe defines "smart growth", I offer some local examples. In Supervisor Ralph Esposito's Westgate project, there are elements of "smart growth" in that an aging strip mall has been re-used rather than simply abandoned, open space has been increased and the public's voice has helped craft the arrangement. In Brighton, a building moratorium has been implemented to study how the town's remaining green space can best be used. In downtown Rochester, a new "urban village" is taking shape in the old Hallman district. Finally, the recently created Council of Governments, I believe, is a good example of inter-municipal cooperation, a pillar idea of "smart growth", which may help reduce intra-county fighting over small businesses.

Like other progressive ideas that are at first misunderstood, I believe our locally elected leaders will eventually embrace "smart growth". Once it is understood that these ideas are forwarded to improve the quality of life for area residents and reduce tax burdens, I believe that people will wonder why there was ever any opposition. We at the Smart Growth Coalition applaud efforts like Supervisor Esposito's and hope others will follow.

Roger Janezic